Page 1 of 3

Need input on my cylinder compression

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:46 pm
by goatnipples2002
Just looking for some input.

Are my compression #'s alarming. I have read that most peoples are in the 150-160 range.

My gauge only has 120 and 150 with 5 marks between the numbers so I came up with each mark at about 6psi.

DRY test
#1-126
#2-144
#3-126
#4-120
#5-132
#6-114-120

WET test
#1-138
#2-150
#3-138
#4-132
#5-156
#6-114-120

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:20 pm
by Shaun41178(2)
I think 6 is toast. probably bad valve since the numbers didnt' go up when doing the wet test.

Do a leakdown on that cylinder.

Other then that they seem normal for a lower compression ratio motor.

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:56 am
by goatnipples2002
yeah my exhaust seals are junk they are those shitty rubber bands. I realized they were wrong as soon as I started my motor for the 1st time. I need to use the premium seals on all my valves not just the intakes. I guess I will check the comp after some new seals. Thanks.

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:45 am
by Series8217
Dude, valve seals have nothing to do with compression. Those are to keep oil from coming down around the valve stem...

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:34 am
by The Dark Side of Will
#5 isn't too strong either. It gained 24 psi wet, while the others only gained 12.

Definitely have a valve problem in #6.

What's done to the engine?

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:26 am
by Blue Shift
Hahah... you had to do math to find out what each tic on your gage is? And yeah, if your valve seals are causing low compression, it's probably cuz one made it's way inside a cylinder...

The uneven nature of your readings isn't good - I got more consistent readings on my 3.4 when it had a bad head gasket and a spark plug non-fouler in #3 when I got it. As for the overall low compression, cam timing and all that shit will change your actual compression readings. Is your cam(s) tweaked?

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:06 am
by goatnipples2002
I have a compcams 260 and my timing is retarded. If it is a valve problem would having my valves reseated solve this problem. I have switched valves and heads without having them reseated.

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:31 am
by whipped
How are you testing compression?

Is this the reading on the 1st stroke? 3rd? 4th?

Is the throttle blocked open?

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:51 am
by The Dark Side of Will
Dunno how he does it, but when I do I just crank until the needle stops going up...

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:19 pm
by Series8217
Make sure you put some oil on the o-ring of your compression tester, sometimes it doesnt seal well enough otherwise and you'll get abnormally low readings.

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:23 pm
by goatnipples2002
Throttle was closed and the o ring was dry...it is a new unit

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:28 pm
by Shaun41178(2)
Looks like you put too much spray to your motor. Looks like not everyone can just slap a kit on and go fast without doing damage to it huh??

FYI I have always done my compression tests with the TB closed. It might make a little difference. No idea though

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:14 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
I believe the textbook method is with throttle open.

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:47 pm
by goatnipples2002
Live and learn as long as it last until the end of the year then I am good.

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:24 pm
by Blue Shift
They say throttle blocked open, and stop on the 4th compression stroke, IIRC.

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:43 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
Who is they?

I've never understood the logic behind trying to stop on a given stroke. The gauge goes up... and then stops. That's the compression reading.

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:53 am
by EBSB52
The Dark Side of Will wrote:Who is they?

I've never understood the logic behind trying to stop on a given stroke. The gauge goes up... and then stops. That's the compression reading.

I agree....

Why not get an aircraft differential compression tester. You pump 80 in, see what ya get out. You have to get a breaker bar on the crank, but it is a more rpeceise way to check, plus, you can check to see where the leak is.

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:10 am
by Blue Shift
EBSB52 wrote:
The Dark Side of Will wrote:Who is they?

I've never understood the logic behind trying to stop on a given stroke. The gauge goes up... and then stops. That's the compression reading.

I agree....

Why not get an aircraft differential compression tester. You pump 80 in, see what ya get out. You have to get a breaker bar on the crank, but it is a more rpeceise way to check, plus, you can check to see where the leak is.
They... are the hand in the shadows manipulating your readings to the benefit of the automotive rebuilders! Quick, hide me before they realize I found out!

...Or not. Yeah I usually just find myself cranking it to whatever ultimate pressure the cylinder can muster. It probably is more consistent/accurate trying to read a cylinder that's in motion and trying to lubricate itself anyways.

EB, I remember helping my dad do the same test on the IO-470's on his Cessna 310 (I actually have a piston on my shelf, it barely press fits into a Folgers Coffee can). I remember him saying something along the lines of "hold onto the prop and don't let it slip" [implications of death and dismemberment]. Isn't that basically just a leakdown test?

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:39 am
by EBSB52
Blue Shift wrote:
EBSB52 wrote:
The Dark Side of Will wrote:Who is they?

I've never understood the logic behind trying to stop on a given stroke. The gauge goes up... and then stops. That's the compression reading.

I agree....

Why not get an aircraft differential compression tester. You pump 80 in, see what ya get out. You have to get a breaker bar on the crank, but it is a more rpeceise way to check, plus, you can check to see where the leak is.
They... are the hand in the shadows manipulating your readings to the benefit of the automotive rebuilders! Quick, hide me before they realize I found out!

...Or not. Yeah I usually just find myself cranking it to whatever ultimate pressure the cylinder can muster. It probably is more consistent/accurate trying to read a cylinder that's in motion and trying to lubricate itself anyways.

EB, I remember helping my dad do the same test on the IO-470's on his Cessna 310 (I actually have a piston on my shelf, it barely press fits into a Folgers Coffee can). I remember him saying something along the lines of "hold onto the prop and don't let it slip" [implications of death and dismemberment]. Isn't that basically just a leakdown test?
Yea, it is a running leakdown, menaing that the 80 is maintained. Also, you can move the move the piston slowly to see if there is a big dropoff as you leave TDC. And the point you make that testing it stopped rathr than moving is right on. It is a bigger pain to diff test it, but more accurate IMO.

Yea, they're fuckin monsters, 470 cubes in 6 cylinders. And I used to think a 454 V8 was big.

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:14 pm
by goatnipples2002
Would switching valves into different heads make a difference on compression if they weren't reseated?