
Eh, I'll just put a new one in it!
Moderator: Series8217
I blued my fronts before, but this time they were just straight up worn out on the rears. Down to the wear bars anyway.THE PUNISHER wrote:A good way to tell yuo have overheated or have worn out Hankooks is look for the Blue tinge. I had several sets on My S197 (285/35/18 all around) and if you cooked them they always turned a slight shade of blue... Best tire out there IMHO.
Still miss this car... POS 964
They're the same. Hankook changed the treadwear rating on the RS3 a year or two ago to 200 without changing the compound.THE PUNISHER wrote:Buddy of mine likes his rivals better then RS3's on his E46 M3, I dunno... RS3's have a lower tread wear rating...
Doing anything May 3/4? Want to make a trip down to Nevada and run Spring Mountain?crzyone wrote:I am so frigin jealous. I still have 3 feet of snow in my front yard and you have been racing for weeks... It was -32* last night...
Nice lap man, unless I'm confused I've raced that track in Forza. Not sure which one, probably 3 but it's a fun track. High HP cars definitely have an advantage with that long stretch.
I will probably leave the oil warmer in place when I install an oil-to-air cooler. I'm thinking about putting the oil-to-air cooler in the location where the stock cat was located, and building a little duct for it. This will keep the lines short and eliminate any bodywork for ducting.Aaron wrote:I assume you're still running the factory water/oil cooler? If it were my car, I'd add an exterior air/oil cooler as well as the water cooler, as the water cooler brings oil up to temperature quicker. And although you don't have cold starts like we do up here, 60-70 degrees is still far cold for oil. Only problem with this is that the water that goes through the cooler bypasses the radiator and goes right back through the engine. But you mentioned the new radiator brought your water temps back in control, so personally I'd leave it there.
Secondly, I'd add a deep sump oil pan to increase capacity. I know you've dealt with the draining problems, but I still don't think 6 quarts is enough for this engine the way it was designed. My pan added 1.5 quarts, and sits just above the cradle crossbars on the 2.8 engine mounts. It'd add some weight, but I think you'd greatly increase engine lifespan. And with how hard you're running it, I'm sure that's a concern with the 3.4.
Thanks!Unsafe At Any Speed wrote:Congrats on moving up to 4. I'm assuming NASA, so you're going to have to apply for a dyno reclass because of the engine swap. I'm curious where they'll base class you. Try to play up how shitty Fieros are...