WCF Open House ( Beerfest ) - June 9th
Moderator: Series8217
- Shaun41178(2)
- Posts: 8737
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:38 pm
- Location: Valencia, CA
www.fieroswest.org
to my disapointment, not alot were taken. I guess I can't blame anybody seeing as how we were all pretty content with just hangin out, drinkin beer, and swappin stories.
The WestFest might have some great pictures ( June 29 to July 1 ) but I myself can't make it due to work. For me it's not even really worth going to any show untill Chris West brings his car out for the first time with the new drivetrain. Essentially a V8, but WCF style!
to my disapointment, not alot were taken. I guess I can't blame anybody seeing as how we were all pretty content with just hangin out, drinkin beer, and swappin stories.
The WestFest might have some great pictures ( June 29 to July 1 ) but I myself can't make it due to work. For me it's not even really worth going to any show untill Chris West brings his car out for the first time with the new drivetrain. Essentially a V8, but WCF style!
I'm not so sure I like the non-equal length 4-2-1 setup, I doubt it will do anything more than a basic shorty header. However it solves the space issue, and more flow can't hurt.crzyone wrote: Nice headers on the Aurora.
Steven, is this you on the left with the red "sash" thing around your back?
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
- crzyone
- JDM Power FTW
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:40 am
- Location: Whitecourt, Alberta, Canada
Looks like it flows 10x better than my non equal length, non smooth factory stamped manifolds. My manifolds are completely different front to back, probabaly flow way different from eachother.Aaron wrote:I'm not so sure I like the non-equal length 4-2-1 setup, I doubt it will do anything more than a basic shorty header. However it solves the space issue, and more flow can't hurt.crzyone wrote: Nice headers on the Aurora.
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:38 pm
- Location: Valencia, CA
Completely agreed.crzyone wrote:Shorty headers suck to begin with. Full length tuned to the motor headers are ideal but it would be guess work in a fiero.
You could get a set custom made but it would be $$ and would never fit.
Those headers are good for what they will be doing.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:38 pm
- Location: Valencia, CA
You guys are more than welcome to come on down to WCF and show Chris how you would do it. Be prepared for long, insightfull points of view from Chris that stem from 40 years of engineering.
I myself am trying to figure out what the point would be of tuned headers when the exhaust is just going to slam agains the turbine wheel anyways - but thats just me.
I myself am trying to figure out what the point would be of tuned headers when the exhaust is just going to slam agains the turbine wheel anyways - but thats just me.
A.G. Bell, from Forced Induction Performance Tuning, says that optimal is a 16"-24" equal length header with a standard collector. He also said there is no real way to figure out which will work best, as there are just so many variables. For their racing team, they started out at 20", and then added and subtracted until the power curve suited what they wanted. It showed the dyno numbers, and there was no obvious correlation between short primaries and which side of the power curve it favored.
He said for most street cars, a 20" long primary would be as good as is plausible. For race cars, with the resources to do so, starting at 20 and then dyno tuning them shorter or longer is optimal.
I am using 20" primaries on my car.
He said for most street cars, a 20" long primary would be as good as is plausible. For race cars, with the resources to do so, starting at 20 and then dyno tuning them shorter or longer is optimal.
I am using 20" primaries on my car.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:38 pm
- Location: Valencia, CA
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:38 pm
- Location: Valencia, CA
Sure, thats cool if you have the time and money to do that - more power to them.Aaron wrote:A.G. Bell, from Forced Induction Performance Tuning, says that........
I'm kinda thrown off by "street cars" should have a specified length and what not. A Honda Accord and Pontiac GTO are street cars, but WAY different motors. Does this idea still apply?
I know it doesn't logically make sense, but that's what he said, so I'm running with it. The headers don't seem to play a part on changing the power curve too much from what I gathered, that was determined more from the engine itself, and the turbocharger to be used.Boscolingus wrote: Sure, thats cool if you have the time and money to do that - more power to them.
I'm kinda thrown off by "street cars" should have a specified length and what not. A Honda Accord and Pontiac GTO are street cars, but WAY different motors. Does this idea still apply?
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
- Series8217
- 1988 Fiero Track Car
- Posts: 6078
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
No, I wasn't at the BBQ except before everyone got there and after they all left (to pick up my car).Aaron wrote:I'm not so sure I like the non-equal length 4-2-1 setup, I doubt it will do anything more than a basic shorty header. However it solves the space issue, and more flow can't hurt.crzyone wrote: Nice headers on the Aurora.
Steven, is this you on the left with the red "sash" thing around your back?
And my hair is at least twice as long as that little shrub.
Probably Delphi MEFI 4 as its not very expensive and is small and tunable. Still looking into other options though.crzyone wrote: Nice headers on the Aurora. I see that it is a 2000+ engine, what are you going to use to run it?
Steve and Chris made them.Did you make the headers for the 4.0? Looks like a cool project with the NSX transmission.
There is no possible way that equal length headers are going to fit in that engine bay with that motor. Actually, the headers in the pics don't fit either. Steve and Chris were redoing them when I was there on Saturday. They hit the firewall in a few places... That motor is HUGE and there still needs to be room for the turbo and exhaust downpipe.. don't forget a muffler too.
They're designed so that two adjacent firing cylinders are never sending pulses down the same primary. If it doesn't make significantly more power than stock manifolds it will at least sound pretty bitchin

I can't remember what the turbo is but its a large twin-scroll piece.. looks about the size of a GT40 or something. It's not a Garret though.
- Series8217
- 1988 Fiero Track Car
- Posts: 6078
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
The NSX tranny shift cables and clutch hydraulics are all underneath the trans, so the turbo will be over the trans by the decklid vent. Plenty of cooling airflow for it there. The trunk won't be touchedcrzyone wrote:I can relate.Series8217 wrote:That motor is HUGE
There is no room in my engine bay, only way to fit a turbo that I coul see is to cut out the trunk, which I did anyways.

- crzyone
- JDM Power FTW
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:40 am
- Location: Whitecourt, Alberta, Canada
The turbo PJB tried to put on the N* is way too small. A proper size turbo, a GT42 or other large turbo would never fit in that location with an intercooler and plumbing.dratts wrote:The turbo kit I got from PBJ puts the turbo right over the tranny. I think he kept the trunk. My N* has no trunk right now. There's room to build a shallow one.
He said his turbo spooled at idle, not good.